Comparison
AGony is a desktop environment that lives in a terminal, so its real neighbors are the terminal multiplexers people reach for when one shell window stops being enough, and the terminal emulator Windows gives you. Here is the honest table — including every row where the established tools win.
Where the others win
tmux
tmux is old, everywhere, and battle-tested to a degree no young project can claim. It runs on every server you will ever SSH into, its scripting is a way of life, and it needs nothing installed on the machine in front of you. If you already speak tmux, AGony will not out-multiplex it — AGony's engine, rmux, is itself a young multiplexer. The AGony pitch is not "better tmux"; it is "a desktop, for the person chords leave behind".
Zellij
Zellij already solved the "friendly multiplexer" problem from the inside: a hint line that teaches you the chords as you go, layouts, floating panes and WASM plugins, in Rust, on Unix. If you are on Linux or macOS and want a kinder multiplexer today, Zellij is the finished answer. AGony bets further — menus and a file panel instead of a cheat sheet — and its Unix desktops are still young.
Windows Terminal
Windows Terminal is not really a rival — it is the room AGony lives in on Windows, and the recommended host for it. It is an excellent terminal emulator: fast, pretty, graphical settings, split panes in tabs. What it does not try to be is a workspace: its panes do not overlap, its sessions do not survive closing it, and it will not suggest the second word of your command. If tabs of raw shells are all you want, you do not need AGony.
The one-sentence version
Choose tmux or Zellij when the terminal is already home and you want more of it, faster; choose Windows Terminal when you want a beautiful place to type; choose AGony when you — or someone you support — want the terminal's power without first memorizing its doors and knock codes. The download is 2.9 MB and the license is open source with ethical restrictions.